Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76241 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 12:23:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 12:23:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 65615 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 12:23:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65380 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 12:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65365 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 12:23:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:23:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zdavatz@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:23:46 +0000 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so1797876qyk.18 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:23:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=65tE9UfH/xhrGnZyykD73pRWL4VBx0aLY4IwezpiftI=; b=CbewQ4hQj3cJ+7NAYa9Ypfa36QLxV8L7irXReb4HSj6/KQzEdFvlgHiWSHnQja4ZkQ SfPuJ5QCvPEATagynHpbUqFDOmxqhBEXCfKkBGfcRa0MB3N0lLdKu47Ym4YJEF6QnenQ 5s0i3x7YHTKRg4XVaTlXQwIHqNtM8csDZQ/j4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vdeuXZGn725zs+qMKropufZj5dfexIU6qwOIQt6ZVHSIf/PV6OsidbkjmribnW4s2B Ohg3wutZDm1kLXTAaIVtdPhwbtwnMieutg+3r8ao3HiTIJ3C7nXJI4JhqH3fZbHCqjqG DxwYLh+qBFuRunBwQ7bhKWFaBY6p12R+2J1lo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.72 with SMTP id l8mr461531qcm.137.1297427005203; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.226.3 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:23:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mod_ruby on Apache for Windows 2.2.17 From: Zeno Davatz To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear Eric Thank you for your reply. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote: >> I am trying to debug mod_ruby to load in Apache for Windows. So far >> Apache for Windows does start with mod_ruby.so but it seems that httpd >> does not start correctly with mod_ruby enabled in Apache for Windows. >> >> The steps I took to compile mod_ruby for Apache for Windows 2.2.17 >> with MinGW are here: > > you should eliminate mingw from the equation if you're mostly > interested in the ruby side. The reason why I need MinGW is because Ruby was compiled with MinGW. I did compile mod_ruby with nmake on Windows. Works fine and Apache starts as well if I install Ruby via nmake as well. Not a problem. But I am dependent on the Oniguruma-patch and that patch can only be applied with MinGW at the moment. Also Ruby compiled with MinGW is faster then when compiled with nmake. Are you a Windows or a Linux User? I am asking because I think I am not that far away. I just need to understand the workings for Apache in Windows a bit better - as mod_ruby does compile with MinGW with the changes I pointed out. So if you can point me towards somewhere to debug mod_ruby for Apache on Windows so that I get my normal Server-Info as on Linux for: Request Phase Participation. I really think it is the Content Handlers that do not work. So there must be something different there in Apache for Windows compared to Apache for Linux. Best Zeno PS: The Ruby-Windows Installer is compiled with MinGW. And that is a great installer.