Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
  b=bb5oZN6US9Xnuax0rkkejSTxiJNRWQWHE/ZBH0U31VbjGu3MkKgXeepQm8cDLwPr118v5yrBZDMpSnZGLnPorfLtvcYsSAVgDBMxDPdWaztdc61YPIpumO/IOcXhRQ8BJv3WZl3h+91eOfziQueiSIqnLwIDkoMpJ6u6pFn1vj0=;
References: <5c902b9e0812310648i190a2447p74b9eb3bb067b206@mail.gmail.com>
  <495E20CC.1070608@rowe-clan.net>  <110771.54407.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com>
  <495E26C6.3050300@rowe-clan.net>  <898003.47798.qm@web54407.mail.yahoo.com>
  <730832.74197.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com>  <495E4440.1010708@kippdata.de>
  <458466.2927.qm@web54402.mail.yahoo.com>
  <5c902b9e0901020932o68f3a1cbg2b21f27a4bdadd98@mail.gmail.com>
  <869643.74420.qm@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
 <5c902b9e0901020945j1a91c65dof3b69a22883b925c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:55:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <95846.98851.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com>

----- Original Message ----

> From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 12:45:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> 
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Nice.  How do people actually handle moderation at the ASF then?
> > You're *supposed* to be using Reply-All when you want to accept
> > a post.  Are none of these clients out there ezmlm-compatible?
> 
> Gmail does the same thing in my last set of moderation emails (the
> last list I moderated got deleted last month).  Reply-all yields
> -accept, not found, -allow.
> 
> I don't *recall* that being the behavior before with Gmail, but it
> seems that's what it does now...  -- justin


Shrug, I can try completely removing the To: header, but I'm fairly
certain that some MTA's will add one back (and a missing To: header
will trigger anti-spam).  Other than that, it's pick your poison 
time, since no universal solution seems at hand.