Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97375 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 15:33:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 15:33:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 19852 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 15:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19702 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 15:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19681 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2004 15:33:38 -0000 Received: from [195.48.144.7] (HELO mail3.aarboard.ch) (195.48.144.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:33:37 -0700 Received: from Aarboard-MTA by mail3.aarboard.ch with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:33:16 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.1 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:33:07 +0200 From: "Andre Schild" To: Subject: Antw: Re: mod_ldap & Win32 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello, I too have downloaded the most current SDK available, but it still = crashes. On what Windows are you running the apache server ? Any chance you could send me your mod_ldap.so & util_ldap.so for windows ? So I can compare/test them with my modules ? Andr=E9 >>> jessh@ptc.com 04.06.2004 17:08:21 >>> Hmmm.... We've had no such problems on 2.0.48 or 2.0.49 on Windows. We did have such problems attempting to build against any Microsoft SDK=20 prior to the Spring 2003 update, however.... Now we just have this problem on UNIX with mod_worker. Andre Schild wrote: >Hello, > >is anyone using the mod_ldap module on win32 platform ? >We have used it up to build 2.0.48 with (almost) no problems. > >But we can't get the mod_ldap from 2.0.49 or from the 2.1 to work. > >The problem is, that apache.exe will crash on the first request >who actually does a authentication via LDAP. > >There is a bug filed in bugzilled for this, but perhaps someone=20 >else has a workaround. > >We have tested it on Windows 2000 & on NT 4.0, but it fails on both. > >Andr=E9 > > > =20 >