Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33974 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2004 19:40:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2004 19:40:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 47531 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 19:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47333 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 19:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47318 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2004 19:40:42 -0000 Received: from [64.236.240.190] (HELO web.turner.com) (64.236.240.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:40:42 -0700 Received: from web.turner.com (Carnival-udp04917950uds.turner.com [10.188.50.146]) by web.turner.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i52JeJDW007627 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:40:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40BE2D44.4020300@web.turner.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:40:52 -0400 From: Brian Akins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040528 Debian/1.6-7 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: x86_64 atomics and linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N AFAIK, the linux x86 atomic stuff can be used unchanged on Linux x86_64. This is based on my digging in the kernel source. All the "functions" apr uses are identical. Should I submit a patch? -- Brian Akins Senior Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies