Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46728 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2004 22:57:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2004 22:57:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13509 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 22:57:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13436 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 22:57:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13422 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2004 22:57:54 -0000 Received: from [206.16.5.38] (HELO cn-sfo1-mail-relay1.cnet.cnwk) (206.16.5.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:57:54 -0700 Received: from [10.16.90.142] (zzz.cnet.com [10.16.90.142] (may be forged)) by cn-sfo1-mail-relay1.cnet.cnwk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i52MvVMK020651 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:57:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Filter: check_local@cn-sfo1-mail-relay1.cnet.cnwk by digitalanswers.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <40BE2D44.4020300@web.turner.com> References: <40BE2D44.4020300@web.turner.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3ACAA57B-B4E8-11D8-8D4F-000A95E678CC@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brian Pane Subject: Re: x86_64 atomics and linux Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:57:31 -0700 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:40 PM, Brian Akins wrote: > AFAIK, the linux x86 atomic stuff can be used unchanged on Linux > x86_64. This is based on my digging in the kernel source. All the > "functions" apr uses are identical. > > Should I submit a patch? Sure, sounds like a good thing to add. Thanks, Brian