Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91545 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2011 10:40:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2011 10:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32087 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 10:40:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31836 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 10:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31827 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2011 10:40:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:40:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.49] (HELO mail-fx0-f49.google.com) (209.85.161.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:40:43 +0000 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so16205681fxm.36 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:40:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FlFsfnnvm7Rp0JNJUcjHIkCdKYTwGSCWXBqOD/3/HyE=; b=ZZmih3HLLQFuD/r3wQJ7hGLiWMvwQExyGPpORbpw8r2Sb9UC2g+s3oASRqHSAGjjee lmKUt3zRfOxlvjnh2RHdx2XJ6UTQJdCpWdKgpY6Q+52Kox2O/ktszk0rTlJtdiONeYoa tlh9vudqrLZ86KAVwUpRuNWkpM7WJ+anfCBu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hVww3IAmA1lPB2JEQlKPGu7lZr/WTXnN5MfhhNJJZuUzWefwgToMgZa6mQbhKRoKRN r1DnG4YL7hS8gcEqYvb50rVexuh/Han5gBfvMEMLlb733rZi55Q3fVNVrCawzDV52SkX jKPPBUtKuiLOteinm1QSxSsbrAiEGvA7DV+1c= Received: by 10.223.89.139 with SMTP id e11mr2347779fam.69.1294396823485; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.118] (host86-146-206-21.range86-146.btcentralplus.com [86.146.206.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3sm6106331fax.31.2011.01.07.02.40.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:40:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D26ED94.40006@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:40:20 +0000 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: FYI: I'm dividing up some test cases References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07/Jan/2011 06:30, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Yes in early Harmony development, we have an agreement that we will > follow RI's behavior to make Harmony compatible to serve more application as > possible - which includes exceptions etc (unless RI does break spec or is > not logical). So I believe there are many testcases checking such > exceptions. > Jesse, I am not against this proposal, but I wonder if it will be a > large mount of work to split them all (unless we found an automatic > solution, e.g, searching the test source for try-catch). Same here, no objections and good luck finding them all ;-) Do you (Jesse) have a naming scheme/whatever in mind for the separation so that you can easily avoid them? (cue perennial debate about testing structure/package names/test names/annotations/...) Regards, Tim