hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-5889) Improve user-limit calculation in capacity scheduler
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:41:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850294#comment-15850294

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-5889:

Hi Sunil,

bq. I am slightly confused here. I think we might need null check. I ll help to share detailed
view for that. ...
I think the latest patch do the correct thing, except one thing:

Instead of doing:

    Map<String, Map<SchedulingMode, Resource>> userMap = (isActive)
        ? preComputedActiveUserLimit
        : preComputedAllUserLimit;

    return !userMap.containsKey(nodePartition)
        || (getLocalVersionOfUsersState(nodePartition, schedulingMode,
            isActive) != latestVersionOfUserCount);

I think it should be enough to do:

return getLocalVersionOfUsersState(nodePartition, schedulingMode,
            isActive) != latestVersionOfUserCount;

The reason is, getLocalVersionOfUsersState will always return -1 when userMap doesn't contains
And {{reComputeUserLimits}} will insert the map and return.

Is my understand correct?

bq. userLimitNeedsRecompute or getLatestVersionOfUsersState are not writeLock protected ...

{{userLimitNeedsRecompute}} is now writeLock-protected (I think you don't need atomicLong
any more but it's fine to keep it as-is). And usage of latestVersionOfUsersState is always
under read/writeLock. So latestVersionOfUsersState.get() is always up-to-date value and will
not be changed during calculation (it is also fine if it is changed during usage, our goal
is to make local cache invalidated).

And one additional minor comment:
1) computeUserLimit:
- Remove {{User user}} from parameter list, and instead of calling lQueue.getUser, it's better
to call this.getUser()

+1 to the latest patch beyond above comments, I think the patch is ready-to-go once Jenkins
give a +1. 

> Improve user-limit calculation in capacity scheduler
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-5889
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5889
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: capacity scheduler
>            Reporter: Sunil G
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>         Attachments: YARN-5889.0001.patch, YARN-5889.0001.suggested.patchnotes, YARN-5889.0002.patch,
YARN-5889.0003.patch, YARN-5889.0004.patch, YARN-5889.0005.patch, YARN-5889.0006.patch, YARN-5889.0007.patch,
YARN-5889.0008.patch, YARN-5889.0009.patch, YARN-5889.v0.patch, YARN-5889.v1.patch, YARN-5889.v2.patch
> Currently user-limit is computed during every heartbeat allocation cycle with a write
lock. To improve performance, this tickets is focussing on moving user-limit calculation out
of heartbeat allocation flow.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message