Mailing-List: contact torque-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Torque Users List" <torque-user@db.apache.org>
From: William Kemper <kempe001@adelphia.net>
To: "Apache Torque Users List" <torque-user@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Torque still dependant on Turbine?
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 09:59:04 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
References: <40A39826.8090205@eminds.se>
In-Reply-To: <40A39826.8090205@eminds.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200405150959.04695.kempe001@adelphia.net>
Reply-To: kempe001@adelphia.net
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Look for the line addIntakeRetrievable =3D true in build.properties (at lea=
st,=20
that works in 3.0.2).

On Thursday 13 May 2004 8:45 am, P=E5l Brattberg wrote:
> Hi, I'm just now looking at using Torque in one of my projects, and
> having read on the site that it is no longer in need of Turbine, I gave
> it a go.
>
> But one thing troubles me, created Base objects implement
> org.apache.turbine.om.Retrievable, which does indeed make Turbine a
> neccessity, or have I missed something?
>
> Is it possible to remove this dependency, or is there some good reason
> it's still there?
>
> I'm using 3.2-dev, fresh from the CVS.
>
> TIA,
>
> / p=E5l

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org