datafu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discussion of 'Becoming a Committer' Page
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:13:18 GMT
Okay will do.  I'll reply back when finished.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This sounds better than the objection model. I agree. That's cool if you
> want to draft it!
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:07 AM Matthew Hayes <
> matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This looks pretty good to me overall.  However for the contributor to
> > committer process, I wonder if we should have a vote in the private list
> > (as we have been doing) instead of someone implicitly becoming a
> committer
> > if there are no vetoes from the discussion.  My concern is that the
> message
> > may be missed and other committers miss the opportunity to share their
> > views in favor or against.  What are your opinions on this?  Also I'd be
> > happy to draft the doc by the way.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, it looks good to me. I like it as is.
> > >
> > > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> > > russell.jurney@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB
> > > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Sam Shah <shahsam@umich.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks good to me. I like the inclusion of non-code contributions as a
> > > path
> > > > to committer status as well.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Russell Jurney <
> > russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Something came up as we prepare DataFu for graduation. We haven't
> > > > > documented the process of nominating and approving new committers.
> > From
> > > > the
> > > > > thread with Matt Hayes:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > So far the process has been that I start a discussion in the
> > private
> > > > list
> > > > > > when I think someone has made enough good contributions.  If
> > there's
> > > > good
> > > > > > feedback we vote.  Anyone in the PPMC can initiate this; we
just
> > > > haven't
> > > > > > documented it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A good example of a page that roughly works this way is here:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> > > > Becoming+a+Committer
> > > > >
> > > > > What do folks think of using this as a template for our process?
> Any
> > > > > additions/edits people want?
> > > > >
> > > > > Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> > > > > russell.jurney@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney>
> > FB
> > > > > <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Russell Jurney @rjurney <http://twitter.com/rjurney>
> russell.jurney@gmail.com LI <http://linkedin.com/in/russelljurney> FB
> <http://facebook.com/jurney> datasyndrome.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message