Mailing-List: contact dev-help@datafu.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@datafu.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+ULb+savd_gY63qJhrqTcTjdG6eS5T-epKKGw_VHN32JGhB-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+ULb+sNmaJNedROSK8nfo3+PvXUv7rNtf27A7e4VYCbreFcHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMqY7X=1Cxvx1j_t2VOn66nxVM6FpRXbZnR8jFLgQ2yMi5UqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA4Vo8BVoqdHgTpSHoKPL6SrmDahGb_H67Q89_UP99C0YB-YQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <622E090B-FBCB-4DF7-8B96-2495269B77AD@classsoftware.com> <CAA4Vo8C72SR=t5fDVsu4DPtQG3Pkdrsf1PQKCtRs4yF0yOD_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <C36EAB77-D616-4BE9-834A-A67E5E37DF0C@classsoftware.com> <CAA4Vo8CFhBrDt+y+QjTPNUbMZXZ4GP1Wh0Qic7mC497jekLbFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <396AF9B8-8E5D-4D1F-B1BF-F6B66B34236B@classsoftware.com> <CA+ULb+savd_gY63qJhrqTcTjdG6eS5T-epKKGw_VHN32JGhB-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:08:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA4Vo8D0Bm-usecucF_0TBjOgg5raRfWBjuQgU+mKw-gZZm9FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Datafu graduation from the Incubator
To: DataFu <dev@datafu.incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c135da243ab1b053a386ea8
archived-at: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:08:57 -0000

--94eb2c135da243ab1b053a386ea8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'll look into DATAFU-121 and releasing it in 1.3.2.

-Matt

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Justin Mclean
> <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I don't understand this comment.  Was there a typo?  The 1.3.1 release
> >> included both the binaries and sources.
> >
> > I would suggest making one more release and have both the source and
> binary reviews
> > by the incubator. But lets wait to see what your mentors think as they
> have a better idea
> > than me re project progress.
>
> It would be great to see 1.3.2 that is nothing else but fix for:
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-121
>
> >
> >> Can you explain more what you mean by this?  I don't understand.  There
> is
> >> a single source release [3] that can generate binaries [1] and [2].
> >
> > The source packages there at [1] and [2]  is not the source package that
> was voted on (it may be a subset?) that seems like a concern.
>
> To me those are part of the binary vote (see Matthew's explanation bellow).
>
> I checked and it looks like they are not publishing official .tar.gz as par
> of the Maven push -- which is perfectly fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>

--94eb2c135da243ab1b053a386ea8--