datafu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Datafu graduation from the Incubator
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:47:06 GMT
I forgot to mention that there was a vote to release the binaries in the
PPMC that passed, which is why I opened a vote in the general list.

-Matt

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Matthew Hayes <
matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> At the time of the 1.3.0 source release I wasn't prepared to release the
> binaries because I hadn't read enough about the process to do it right.  I
> actually started a vote for releasing the 1.3.0 binaries to maven in the
> general list later after the 1.3.0 source release vote passed but was told
> that the vote was not necessary and should not be completed.  For the 1.3.1
> release both were made available for vote at the same time.
>
> Here are the relevant messages from the archive regarding the 1.3.0
> binaries:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> general/201512.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7iBJunhfsNcwgRnWmjq-4DdY%
> 2BM6eiff0-jXcnB8eGsDLw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201512.mbox/%
> 3CCF2EEC06-F7FA-49D6-B401-F7536EFF4622%40classsoftware.com%3E
>
> -Matt
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >  Binaries were released later in the Apache maven repo.
>>
>> Why were these:
>> a) Not voted on at the same times as the source release?
>> b) Was a vote taken to release them?
>> c) Released without having the incubator look at them?
>>
>> I know there’s some confusion around binary connivence releases and the
>> above.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message