Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA98E116A4 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31444 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-crunch-dev-archive@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 31399 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@crunch.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@crunch.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@crunch.apache.org Received: (qmail 31387 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31384 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:43:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Josh Wills (JIRA)" To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (CRUNCH-420) Breakpoints Not Working MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Wills reassigned CRUNCH-420: --------------------------------- Assignee: Josh Wills > Breakpoints Not Working > ----------------------- > > Key: CRUNCH-420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-420 > Project: Crunch > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: Crunch 0.8.2 > Reporter: Allan Shoup > Assignee: Josh Wills > Attachments: Breakpoint2IT.java, testBreakpoint_plan.png > > > Reading through CRUNCH-294, it looks like materialize is supposed to function as a breakpoint to the planner. I've seen several plans where it appeared to me a particular DoFn shouldn't have been repeated, but it was. > I'll attach some supporting material. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)