Mailing-List: contact dev-help@crunch.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@crunch.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of allan.shoup@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.195 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKFfB9=wxuUL218=_-3hsT27YHvKvB9FEUiyM63zcNf8m39UJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+4w4HcsD1XAUtHV8=vxVH72dRrxCeQm_UjhKNBRc6_uWZZ9kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKFfB9=wxuUL218=_-3hsT27YHvKvB9FEUiyM63zcNf8m39UJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:47:08 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CA+4w4HfUKPJNoaTb7yBuh-03qf_gh3HxP_SGw4dmxfymnq6pRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Binary Passivity
From: Allan Shoup <allan.shoup@gmail.com>
To: dev@crunch.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53d55f5caeb5204fc861bb3

--bcaec53d55f5caeb5204fc861bb3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-426


On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Micah Whitacre <mkwhit@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure we explicitly strive for it but that change is my fault.  You
> can log a bug and I'll try to see what I can do to fix it.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Allan Shoup <allan.shoup@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It looks like crunch-hbase:0.8.3 is not binary-compatible with 0.8.2 (the
> > HBaseSourceTarget changed the second parameter from a Scan to a Scan[]).
> Is
> > binary passivity a goal? If so, I can file a bug for this.
> >
>

--bcaec53d55f5caeb5204fc861bb3--