Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-1816-apmail-creadur-dev-archive=creadur.apache.org@creadur.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6A74F06D
	for <apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:13:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 69900 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 20:13:25 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69838 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 20:13:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@creadur.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@creadur.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@creadur.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.creadur.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69822 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2013 20:13:25 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:13:24 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.179] (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com)
 (209.85.212.179)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:13:19 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hn17so4512505wib.6
        for <dev@creadur.apache.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=14O223kitUn0bzoEzhjrZuE0LX3JXfKRaCDsrovQNB0=;
        b=FKlkUm8tiFk+HOpg8urQX+1mN4+DwFSInsZZcRWLnPCpiGOclfCbE1vy0P+v80fumU
         0nPG0UdiD5PSO5lPP2ooL8dYYzU4F1m4SPbz+2Vst8kbTtSnByrGW2RVb9hfH95YHyh5
         mLUNG4icRBro0075/f5TQc+KGIXYFC61NhFWPr8eMHB+JBpwfphO2Ebda4WwSGkgUxe4
         yGuXt0KjcJVX8fF7QTfavzVVy4kVe0om5In6hy11a23cYz4IvY2YiHtvi8qs5MPOapGr
         NIdWRAtPnVEI58SxWSCh5egowM+9dXxKLV1dO+CaSyovOSNX2D6lKRX3ZjJ61QbmNJ5E
         yYgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.82.33 with SMTP id f1mr27913127wiy.13.1364242379262;
 Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.61.236 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51503A8D.9030909@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <51503A8D.9030909@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:12:59 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAOGo0VZ3W06fd_vwTA-hoi24Yw6X=fKNkKP-njfML+=RLjyKKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tentacles] Upgrade to Latest Apache Parent...?
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: dev@creadur.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 25 March 2013 11:52, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Rat and Whisker inherit from the latest Apache parent pom (13). Tentacles
> still inherits from 11. I'm wondering about upgrading Tentacles from 11 to
> 13.
>
> Objections? Opinions? Suggestions?

Unles there were issues with Rat/Whisker, why not?

> Robert