Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 964B89A13 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58037 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 23:17:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-creadur-dev-archive@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57975 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 23:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@creadur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@creadur.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@creadur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57967 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2013 23:17:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:17:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:17:50 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so4323810wey.28 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:17:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hNpmkKbLfLXyQVuoqbXUv6dl2VxCTGW4IBl11dyAl2k=; b=zojm2zk/GUQcPFRnTfdkaJoJYooh4I0omVBatMVA2u0PsSKzwUlrPy7xYY9Op14lAw CaQJEPCcZuNbsPMwDKInXwleGoLqL47JE08Zv/+IFc0zp9o5S2ZtSdYMA1u0E1HeQqRE YU7VlVyCN0XlnPPZ7P3Te8Pzv+B+qw5/WttLHpa0eN3o0+7bzBF8YAoYC2aTysaIBfvt oB3yCxk/anvdC0PqUZkyYUdD/x4B6xURQEY81pQxy/DxGJhYTcm2w8mj4RoR2qqimMef mNp1+wmpjvZ8Xy/KMei/YZoywbTlrUfoI8na9enOr87Ko0/9HD87xoWeBZ7Qdq+ERCk1 SWVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.11.198 with SMTP id ek6mr21274807wid.1.1363043850473; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.61.236 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:17:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <513E46FF.7050905@aiki-it.de> References: <513DC558.8060000@blueyonder.co.uk> <513E46FF.7050905@aiki-it.de> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:17:30 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrade to latest Apache Parent pom...? From: sebb To: dev@creadur.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11 March 2013 21:05, P. Ottlinger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 11.03.2013 12:51, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: >> Opinions? > > +1 > Go for it. > > Should we raise the version of Java as well? > No. That's completely different, as it affects end users directly. The version of Java should only be increased if necessary to support essential new features. Otherwise it just prevents the code from running on some user systems for no good reason.