creadur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <>
Subject Re: Issue with orgapachecreadur-019 [WAS Re: Staging Apache Rat 0.9]
Date Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:17:13 GMT
On 03/26/13 20:37, sebb wrote:
> On 26 March 2013 12:18, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <> wrote:


>> I'm less sure about the best approach to numbering this new candidate. (In
>> the past, I've cut release candidates first. Even with a staging repository
>> this would have been sensible.) I lean towards 0.9.1, eliminating any risk
>> that two signed 0.9 could escape into the wild.
>> Opinions? Objections? Suggestions?
> Not sure you need to worry about the files escaping from the staging
> repo - that's part of the point, they are not yet published files.
> So long as you delete the repo they won't be published.

Yes, now that the repo has been dropped, escape is unlikely

I'm comfortable with either trying a 0.9 again or cutting a 0.9.1

Is there consensus that trying again to cut a 0.9 release would be the 
best approach?


View raw message