Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2331A200C23 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:05:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 21B28160B72; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 62A02160B49 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 65371 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2017 18:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 65355 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2017 18:05:31 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A1C731AA2A4 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6yf51mSe1IM for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4CED25F30F for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38406562DEC for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id CeI-4vcqsYTS for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE8F562E01 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:16 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.justsomehost.net Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MxkX8pcMfrLJ for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B32562DEC for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:16 -0500 (EST) From: Joan Touzet Reply-To: Joan Touzet To: user@couchdb.apache.org Message-ID: <32909238.2143.1487786719102.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> In-Reply-To: <80328989-7851-438F-A5D9-F4D3BC17F76F@apache.org> References: <80328989-7851-438F-A5D9-F4D3BC17F76F@apache.org> Subject: Re: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process timed out MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [204.11.51.157] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1194 (Zimbra Desktop/7.2.8_12102_Windows) Thread-Topic: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process timed out Thread-Index: PA/FlswCC7dWypNXUiVUwhSYV0ZGDw== archived-at: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:05:33 -0000 > > Any idea of what could be going on? I am running CouchDB 2.0.0.1 > > under Windows 7 with a single node. I have not modified most of > > the default CouchDB settings. >=20 > I haven=E2=80=99t kept pace with the current state of the art in the Wind= ows > build, so there may be other platform-specific issues at work with > this =E2=80=9COS process timed out=E2=80=9D. Cheers, Not to my knowledge, other than somewhat poorer performance than the same machine running Linux. Bump the limits that Adam describes, or get smaller documents; if neither of those help please let us know. -Joan