Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:42:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org>
Reply-To: Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Message-ID: <14959631.2909.1488041228852.JavaMail.Joan@RITA>
In-Reply-To: <D99C93B6-564E-44BD-B357-108855A9B7B9@utt.fr>
References: <DM3PR0601MB19956E5C26BD3C4163B18068E4510@DM3PR0601MB1995.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <DM3PR0601MB1995247147E189F2770AA9FAE4500@DM3PR0601MB1995.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <15217215.2200.1487815340266.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> <DM3PR0601MB199579F7C44DCA17AF48B59AE4530@DM3PR0601MB1995.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <3953301.2412.1487890087614.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> <DM3PR0601MB1995723E6EE8C78BD5B2BE9EE4520@DM3PR0601MB1995.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <29604577.2769.1487979779350.JavaMail.Joan@RITA> <D99C93B6-564E-44BD-B357-108855A9B7B9@utt.fr>
Subject: Re: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process timed
 out
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process timed out
Thread-Index: LutOLxTcuIrO7TwLB2ejPi469vkRRw==
archived-at: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:47:29 -0000

HI Aur=C3=A9lien,

Your email is aggressive, and your apology is not accepted. I disagree that=
 a "significant part of the user base" needs this functionality, as do the =
overwhelming majority of the PMC and the commercial entities on this mailin=
g list.=20

This topic has been discussed to death on the mailing lists and I am not go=
ing to be pulled into a retread of this argument.

For the latest developer discussions on this topic, search for the words "D=
eprecation Wishlist" in this message:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201702.mbox/%3CB6DB98E=
C-42B1-4960-9E43-257F040238F1%40apache.org%3E

You may also want to search on the word "NoJS".

-Joan

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aur=C3=A9lien B=C3=A9nel" <aurelien.benel@utt.fr>
> To: user@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 9:33:38 AM
> Subject: Re: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process ti=
med out
>=20
> Hi Joan,
>=20
> > couchapps are, in effect, deprecated functionality.
>=20
> What do you mean exactly by saying this?
> That CouchDB is now just a DB and no more an application server?
> That all the time and code invested by my team and my partners since
> 2010 are now wasted?
> That I should stop immediately teaching CouchDB in my university as a
> perfect example on how to implement a RESTful API and Web
> application?
>=20
> Which features needed for =C2=AB couchapps =C2=BB are going to disappear =
in
> future releases?
>=20
> Is it a definitive decision? Or is it still possible to discuss it?
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Aur=C3=A9lien
>=20
> P.S. Sorry if my e-mail looks aggressive, but I=E2=80=99m really really
> worried=E2=80=A6
> I=E2=80=99m surprised too to discover such an important news on a nearly
> unrelated topic, whereas the last time the need for =C2=AB couchapps =C2=
=BB
> were discussed on the =C2=AB user =C2=BB list, a few years ago, there was=
 a
> consensus that it was a really important feature for a significant
> part of the user base.