Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70FB4FEAE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76766 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2013 17:52:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75281 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2013 17:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 74888 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2013 17:52:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:52:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of siriele2x3@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:52:26 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id w61so7847661wes.3 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=n6jrCgouvBn/fRKQO/RArUk6PoZuMut+gvJTSXNN7bI=; b=PBkP9Xl6KEQBEoZpyg0moukxzyragkJitZmVo8n9adDXuqQj7hYb7YscU4ogA7LTyD m0Muun70L0OPIlvI4Q4v4yCjVvgiCKHpj8/k6NCMx5lypQIc885T85MOy5/oY11edqBD hBhHhHu49YdXPfrH4DzrchYZm04r3PoY69HM+1w4kWk1MrvNlxvow2EYOKmNJ4UrEqyH uaU5cR0KIAiZ3gCeEOOuMeYbrC7ssGT20DOYN6N9e4tdU96+A7rKWSxHg2JpVD73vLUm cJ0s7YuwSrh2LPtNS5/Bbrq2uWl0ZfgvZuc/CYf/qcY2XCSajPAxpISVAWBNv/3LTrQi VLHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.189.49 with SMTP id gf17mr19451692wic.23.1380649926533; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.58.244 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.58.244 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:52:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb From: Stanley Iriele To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33fd06e273d04e7b19cc9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c33fd06e273d04e7b19cc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ahh...phone typo... What he said kinda made me doubt my knowledge... But I'm glad that what I thought is right On Oct 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Jens Alfke" wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele wrote: > > > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb" > > (Is =93to,es=94 a mathematical term or just a typo for =93times=94? ;-) > > I think this comparison is apples vs. oranges, as R-tree is a data > structure while CouchDB is a program. There is a geospatial index extensi= on > for CouchDB (https://github.com/couchbase/geocouch/) which likely uses > R-trees internally; if you need to do lots of fast range searches (in one > or more dimensions) it would be a good idea to try it out. > > =97Jens --001a11c33fd06e273d04e7b19cc9--