Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33E59107E2 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35868 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2013 18:59:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 35586 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2013 18:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 35578 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2013 18:59:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:59:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of siriele2x3@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:59:09 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i13so1977474qae.2 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cj4q2f3TDtLi481cjHCpQJLNATojhagfVpH0WDCnS3s=; b=nvtYW0M3EM9ErAtcuftky1ad19V4lJ40siXjhz5Yc2NDm3g2kcFUWLPfI5MBCaIKqJ g7kFJ1VWKy3w0se5B/xXjAfVnFBjH6X1UL21yPYdhleHZPHbo0e2b4zlBtzQnQRCEhZf hCHq+wNtU4I/p5xuDiBwYyjKC6qGywmrr+i3z5Ut2RPQsKwRhVetKrnxVIQxkf8sIQ5L OY6sGLM0VyErQJWd2cXXiVtGIPpUmz2wrArKG+GWNC8WIb/Daf147hnLWYHtOcFkI0Gm pF5LtjsUfnk9euBVQyuw2B5hBLHKUy3thaJKx0BgjcM1z/cNswpBNfFOY81XDpxo9SCc CMYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.125.138 with SMTP id y10mr18241853qar.40.1382295529179; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.72.76 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:58:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Finding the right value for compaction configuration parameters From: Stanley Iriele To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c300f4fdd13b04e930c113 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c300f4fdd13b04e930c113 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hey Boaz, have you seen this documentation on what the various parameters mean? http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Compaction On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Boaz Citrin wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if anyone had the chance to read this and has any idea... > > Also, we are looking for some consulting, so if anyone can offer his > services please email me directly. > > Thanks, > > Boaz > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Boaz Citrin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Testing database compaction with various doc_buffer_size values I get > > completely different results. > > Documentation is fairly vague, so I wonder how to choose the right value; > > What parameters affect this - HD buffer size, average doc size, > > database size, fragmentation, etc... ?! > > > > Same goes for view compaction and keyvalue_buffer_size. > > > > (For me the the compaction with default values was many times slower > > than with the values that gave the faster compaction). > > > > Thanks! > > > --001a11c300f4fdd13b04e930c113--