Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 073CF9F89 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91811 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2012 07:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 91775 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2012 07:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 91760 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2012 07:46:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:46:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.180] (HELO mail-yx0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:45:59 +0000 Received: by yenq6 with SMTP id q6so1468742yen.11 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ePaDl6YjZtDb073jiJiAWMHqK+x5TO/L01E5yjJAPo4=; b=XQHkTHNQ8+WskcGWXCA56Mp6IvXgU5Zhx2lTIDg7eU5BHQSMWpYwwn7OSruh4qjlTV 8XQLEdGILDS8+QLTjHhzyKlw4fpyBTWBwme5nVqiIdybVGQVoIxw6MaMDR5ZEqy1nJ7X 5spJfQTRuWH25Azx9rNsx5cFoYcNEdvgvRhXsRhl1MuvLg9a++zdYFmEZy5rI/l32rsG Ic1WvzWADLmgV7YjOkdhi9DGHMZBnwPtle76ltDFVRPN/znERHS2B8jmQO8olEVxKXve u3kKcbPYZWtSq7iK8oP3RubCUhn9jmHGnLsJVpthCCG06q1XnQztplgZbogUp8aObt7s ZhkA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.45.234 with SMTP id q10mr1688810igm.54.1336635938555; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.44.4 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:45:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: when couchdb is not right for my use case From: bryan rasmussen To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I really like working with couchdb, one of the benefits it gives at the beginning of a project is the ability to play with data, to determine the right data structure that one actually needs (since I'm an XML guy this is pretty important to me[I also think couchdb does this much better than XQuery based DBs - too strongly typed]) So anyway, because I like couchdb I have embarked on a apache/solr logs analysis project for which couchdb does not seem to be well-suited (which I knew beforehand but was using couchdb as quick proof of concept for some of the things I wanted to do.) the drawbacks are: logs pile up quickly, so the project is write intensive. Since the data is being used internally for reports it is not likely to be read intensive. Should not need any revision management. A lot of the benefits of db replication will not be useful. Lots of views to data need to be provided. So has anyone ever had a similar situation, and what did you move to as your DB. Or how did you structure you couchdb solution to make it more suitable? Thanks, Bryan Rasmussen