Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7DE999BC for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29573 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2012 08:46:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 29167 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2012 08:46:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 29151 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2012 08:46:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:46:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cgsmcmlxxv@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:46:46 +0000 Received: by qabg1 with SMTP id g1so5832837qab.6 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HQuUFcVEIjHyR4NuV6DrcGSi8zn0ueQGcgq5GzKIrx0=; b=Jj7sVzfk5ol4ERv8YAOTWdGLJqR1AeNwBJm4QrUUgQh26evJxIGMFOqC06vGedyypy r+kajB5bL/thngjygEC+R1yqLcTIIiAMTB0/dq0ieBRgTG7gf9IRrxKjmzMHqhn8BhfO HmWPo1wVUfOXU7l0bEwUGcuCWz4Vfc8TtJ6fl1ivC9tf2a7OKgYSrPbELvLxmb19ZO70 WN3oj4qi3QhsvnhKP/GzQJgZJRvgakk4MKJXbCEeFj2AFldhsHojxRlR8J0KabXcr+26 Q6Qz3WyZwOxQMZ/DbAq8UMaEs/bzZ48qgr/ikEadfww9UUBCxbNFv6GXAVedlfRzWrZU /MoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.179.201 with SMTP id br9mr6431384qab.34.1334393185659; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.134.70 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120414002434.GA22219@atypical.net> References: <20120414002434.GA22219@atypical.net> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:46:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help shape the future of CouchDB: your voice needed! From: CGS To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334fd9d26c3904bd9f9f97 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30334fd9d26c3904bd9f9f97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Joan, Very interesting voting system, but there are few questions I would like to address: 1. The vote is about comparing the priorities/importance which means (from what I noticed the one time comparison is a randomly chosen cell in the 38x38 matrix less the main diagonal) 1406 answers. Even at half (say, taking the upper part of the matrix) it means 703 answers. Isn't it a bit too much? Wouldn't it be simpler to cast a mark for each key feature? 2. Let's say one wants to exhaust all the possibilities (that would be really something!!!). No one can stay to answer 703 slides in one session (that's for sure). But here comes another inconvenient I consider: your votes are vanishing (reduced to 0) after a period of inactivity. Am I wrong or one needs to cast her/his votes in one session (as many as she/he can) and after that to stop? Wouldn't it be easier a system soccer betting system: 1x2 (where "x" means "I can't decide")? E.g., a form with tabulated data like this (with pagination, of course): 1. "Partial updates of documents" vs. "Hide the _users database behind an API" Just a 2c opinion. CGS On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Joan Touzet wrote: > Thanks to everyone who participated in the CouchDB summit in Boston this > week! In case you didn't know, the (25 pages!) of meeting minutes are > available for review at http://s.apache.org/ndI . > > Here's where we need YOUR HELP. During the summit, the participants > identified 38 key features we think are important for CouchDB's future. > Please help us RANK these ideas by visiting our All Our Ideas page: > > http://www.allourideas.org/couchdb2012/ > > All Our Ideas is a free/open source solution for voting based on > pairwise comparison - think Kittenwar - and is super easy to use. > > Please complete as many comparisons as you can; we'd like all the > feedback we can get. We'd be thrilled if each of you did at least 100 > comparisons. > > Thanks again for your help in determining the future of Apache CouchDB! > > -- > Joan Touzet | joant@atypical.net | wohali everywhere else > --20cf30334fd9d26c3904bd9f9f97--