Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPinO9ft2F-Zfwqg4vemGo8sZ6uf3BRtJkn172cCzNc03rqpMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPinO9e9z4bndagMFrgLk3tUFkSUM2xBiyCq=KQim-63s-Xs+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKrexVJgibMHFYhk8nsX2Dxp2OqKp+v3j0Sh4ZdccFiPS0XosA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABvT1DFpiwp-tfYOBh0CdPZ9A6JfecrHFKJAE=CcQ-ApKQ7eNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPinO9dtDsTn-2BNsPCYZM_ChV4zrCRETe2phR_3PqtQvKuDNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPinO9ft2F-Zfwqg4vemGo8sZ6uf3BRtJkn172cCzNc03rqpMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:40:26 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABvT1DHFMPUNr7piy2-g2YMJFy=TY8fWkSfceV4gr8d=i1jTaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: view_duplicated_id on CouchDB 1.2
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan,

Dupes are only logged if found when compacting the view, not the database. =
:(

B.

On 18 April 2012 15:34, Stefan K=F6gl <koeglstefan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Stefan K=F6gl <koeglstefan@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wro=
te:
>>> The first step is to ensure that your database does not contain
>>> duplicates. To do this, you need to compact it in a special way.
>>> Create a 0 byte dbname.compact file in the same place that the normal
>>> .compact file would be, and then compact. This will force the retry
>>> mode of the compactor which will more aggressively check for
>>> duplicates.
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion -- I'll try that! I assume I would run into
>> the same problems again if a re-build the view from a db with
>> duplicates.
>
> The aggressive db compaction is running now (for ~5 hours already),
> and still at 1% progress, so it seems it does its job very thorough ;)
> Does the db compaction log if it detects and removes any duplicates?
>
> -- Stefan