Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67145 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 23:32:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 23:32:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 39544 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 23:32:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39363 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 23:32:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39331 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 23:32:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of steven.prentice.87@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-iw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:08 +0000 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so7568450iwn.11 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:31:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QVwBrNVC/5+1EZulG+Ekg+wge+iy08EuRTyrKCUfly8=; b=g+gHS+SVoU5xgXW88EtdQKVAyeIAaeyvQF/x21s7kfEESLsXYcHWjeoBAL/+O6MbdQ jPVro1+gUquUP+DcBgfNendvHKC4TF1uh7iBIkWq0Z1HrFIjFuAbR4BMOky3P8WHJ+Bf 6cGe6AOLHYiO0cz9y+z85QvOAzfsAKZ4SYe+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FhmubnzJb1B8I5ZZAOI92F3g/XBAmun4pc6JWPwVwgn9n6xTdcnUsLRwVmCNcnceG0 HGzCVsuTFx2zGaw0KH9JZzTp87svRj8FTzMFFuX+xeogszrpOSdmBrc65jPPZvtGL3a2 mVvOOfqTUe1fYeXPstitEjPETnV4nly83ecZQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.6 with SMTP id dk6mr9622289ibb.51.1280878306983; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.126.22 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:31:46 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: VIEW Performance Testing Help From: Steven Prentice To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8c367d0192048cf3b88f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b8c367d0192048cf3b88f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Couchinators! My friend and I are trying to test the impact that views have on the size of the database and have a few questions... 1. if the value of a view is set to 'doc' does that mean that the leaves of the view B-Tree are now documents or are they simply pointers to the document leaves in the database B-Tree? i.e would the summed memory of all of the values in the view be equal to the size of the database (ignoreing revisions)? 2. also we would like to know if the database size that is displayed in futon includes the size of the views? 3. Oh also, Revisions...is a revision an entire document or does a revision only track changes in a document? Cheers Steve + Adam --0016363b8c367d0192048cf3b88f--