Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kolosy@gmail.com designates
 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=Wrqwfdmto9FIoVt9mxD7UaqGb11hdqH8UeefdrUkLTz2qv26STIKfCTwppdtDHORWc
         76AEM50R7plSqFhglbqSlaoS0zyMLCG/7s7PG0mvDm3U6ZpSQx+SFz2IL+snLgAV8fEe
         kqmoIVgEj8cIvelHpJD7y8kKf0+SpKXsxx7eM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: kolosy@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AE452B5B-0B57-48FA-A43D-44BB5DCCBED9@apache.org>
References: <8098243e0911081848t50f0899au412758a22406a441@mail.gmail.com>
	 <AE452B5B-0B57-48FA-A43D-44BB5DCCBED9@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:03:48 -0600
Message-ID: <8098243e0911090503j42ec761cha26c0b6fe663bb2b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pull replication + firewalls
From: Alex P <apedenko@kolosy.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdff92812aa490477efd39e

--000e0cdff92812aa490477efd39e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

ah. that makes sense, thanks.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:

> On Nov 8, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Alex P wrote:
>
>  hey all,
>>
>> i was trying to pull down a db from a remote server via pull replication
>> to
>> my laptop. now, it's windows, and therefore suspect, but this may be
>> something else. when i attempt pull replication initiated from windows
>> 0.91
>> laptop to ubuntu 0.10 server, it crashes with this stack:
>>
>> [error] [<0.103.0>] {error_report,<0.22.0>,
>>   {<0.103.0>,crash_report,
>>    [[{pid,<0.103.0>},
>>      {registered_name,[]},
>>      {error_info,
>>          {exit,
>>              {badarg,
>>                  [{ets,lookup,
>>                       [ibrowse_lb,
>>                        {"server removed to protect the innocent",<port
>> number>}]},
>>                   {ibrowse,send_req,6},
>>                   {couch_rep,do_http_request,5},
>>                   {couch_rep,get_db_info,1},
>>                   {couch_rep,init,1},
>>                   {gen_server,init_it,6},
>>                   {proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]},
>>              [{gen_server,init_it,6},{proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}},
>>      {initial_call,{couch_rep,init,['Argument__1']}},
>>      {ancestors,
>>          [couch_rep_sup,couch_primary_services,couch_server_sup,<0.1.0>]},
>>      {messages,[]},
>>      {links,[<0.53.0>]},
>>      {dictionary,[]},
>>      {trap_exit,true},
>>      {status,running},
>>      {heap_size,610},
>>      {stack_size,23},
>>      {reductions,320}],
>>
>> when i decided to try to push from the ubuntu server to the laptop (ports
>> 5984 was opened on both attempts), everything went swimmingly. this last
>> part makes me think that may be this is a firewall issue of some sort. for
>> pull replication, do the dbs attempt to talk over any port other than 5984
>> (or whatever is configured locally)?
>>
>> thanks,
>> alex.
>>
>
> I'm guessing this is a bug in the Windows startup script.  It needs to
> execute ibrowse:start(), but it hasn't.  The firewall doesn't appear to play
> a role at all.  The reason push replication works is that your Ubuntu
> machine is making the HTTP requests, so ibrowse on the Windows machine is
> not involved.  And
>
>
>  do the dbs attempt to talk over any port other than 5984 (or whatever is
>> configured locally)?
>>
>
> Nope, they don't.  Best, Adam
>

--000e0cdff92812aa490477efd39e--