Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 79991 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 23:29:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 23:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 23129 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23103 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact couchdb-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23094 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:29:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of papersmith@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.248] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:29:03 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so490392ana.83 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=kGNSQtnZqy7Gfjj62LGcGNxAvTcgVdqp9Sz7Wzw1fOU=; b=ZyjD4P41fTOEWp9IU5wuEOmCLjXO/qIV4aKIHNRzEkdWwbm+H0DUroIWHBZHtdo+/vXkVB4SEzpCdFiQQhfwTFuU6rHLhF/zc+sbCVWLm1d33SPGHrmn/7GPjiiVKuAvKXztCCCD3MbCWvmg+0p82uSXwpllIEnah8njbdF0pgQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nplHMsUs1U1PDBvuk42vb7pz8Q3uFCOzW2rmp0FXWF8XiRxkl8nTxZuYxKM3PfrsTJLJXNMilPHAaU3nkFcXgX1ZHfTcSEVJZH8YseMgHzSEyqT50cpcZhDiLHyAjPLvZg5aMv+JxAXRVwDoKGhFHI9Zgw4aOUoI83OEi28gvwo= Received: by 10.100.37.20 with SMTP id k20mr11965475ank.36.1205191751460; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.67.19 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <99849f280803101629v6438e9f8r32038c201f72f81a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:29:11 -0700 From: "B W" To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions regarding readiness for production environment In-Reply-To: <37815532-9007-43C8-AB4D-8380892CF3DD@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_54922_29847812.1205191751450" References: <99849f280803101451w696a5e4dud397d23b1c7b32f@mail.gmail.com> <37815532-9007-43C8-AB4D-8380892CF3DD@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_54922_29847812.1205191751450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jan, Thanks for the prompt reply. On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Hi, > On Mar 10, 2008, at 14:51 , B W wrote: > > I am currently working on a public-facing web app and I would love > > to use > > couchdb. I apologize if these question have been asked before, but > > seeing > > couchdb is in active development, it'd be nice to have some updated > > info. > > What's you web app about? (if you want to share :) > The general idea right now is a site for organizing events. The idea is still not polished, so I'll be adding more features as I go, that's why I find couchdb's flexible schema attractive. :) > > > > The web site says the interface is stable enough for application > > development, but what about implementation-wise as of 0.7? I don't > > have an > > urgent need for the features on the wiki road map right now since > > it's a new > > project, but I was wondering if there are any performance caveats or > > major > > bugs I need to be aware of? > > The API, particularly dealing with attachments is still in flux now. I > don't > know of any show-stopping bugs, though. CouchDB is not yet optimised for > speed. While fast enough for tests, it could be a lot faster. One > thing you will > encounter pretty quickly is that database size grows fast at the > moment when > you add or delete documents. The process to deal with that > (compaction) is > just being implemented. If you don't want to wait for that, you can > still manually > compact your databases by bulk copying their contents to new temporary > dbs and then switch over regularly. Sounds like a bit of a chore and > it is, > but it works. > > With us, "alpha" means that we do not have all the features in we want > for > a first major release, but the things that are in are pretty stable. > We still > don't recommend using CouchDB for anything mission-critical, as we > can't > vouch for the safety of your data. That said, the current code-base > didn't > show any critical bugs as of yet. But don't quote me on that if you lose > your data :-) > > > > > I'm also wondering what kind of time frame should I expect for the > > next > > major releases? > > I can't make any commitments here, but we try to get the compaction out > to you as quickly as possible. That would be great! :D One question though, once compaction is added, will it have compatibility problem with my existing un-compacted data? Thanks! Bob ------=_Part_54922_29847812.1205191751450--