Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F59918911 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97719 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 20:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 97679 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 20:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 97664 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2015 20:55:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:55:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7AA0EF3484 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:55:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.526 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.526 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.625, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFi9QQXVwjBT for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9970B204C8 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so90509463wic.1 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=neEXzYCZCP54D9cy9frJIjt3pf8YywyAg3u6JkyCuVg=; b=v15UeA+UfdG6gDj5kv57pQ+Azhz5MOAXBOK9IcIWAsfbN0J955ZA3hDMKZAukM1tEo h7Yow9E+YPjz8LHzfp565AEmHiBYjG/ieTNlOAQBVua3O8vQixkb+fp4KN1oA6s0GqFF 7LntMdp2Y36CrdFGUSi+YFtE/Ha5OKJgsQ/fHsTl6ydFHp56dR/pxdLhJkBb11NAElVf TLuMsEYUdQL1AFD4i77nJH60d8EbSV4UnlVmK9lQHGEztxkYFX0g/mH7dVWkxG86jXXe STExu+FtB2nYYoHCR3mvxXous/8IPMUxaOdbjjZeMtyVjrWNn9P/gYH1DEXWwiu8xgpT MXkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.91.131 with SMTP id ce3mr23100364wib.84.1442436937453; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.47.65 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:55:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5DD3530A-0EC3-46D7-8CE1-2CDF8CEBFAE0@b2w.com> References: <598DB9A8-EC3C-4DA6-9C8E-FF776492FD05@apache.org> <9249618D-5CEA-4A1E-A97A-937C8C01F32E@b2w.com> <4C16CD94-7F17-4140-ABC3-1C34F38C9F5A@apache.org> <5DD3530A-0EC3-46D7-8CE1-2CDF8CEBFAE0@b2w.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:55:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] WHY/HOW/WHAT From: Harald Kisch To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04388e554494e0051fe385da --f46d04388e554494e0051fe385da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Slogan #3: "kickass database for the future" +1 harald On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Johs Ensby wrote: > Fair and square challenge, Jan > I also appreciate the emotional energy and don't want to be in the > crossfire, but let it keep its stated direction: "kickass database for th= e > future" > > Johs > > PS > Since this still is the VOTE thread.. > > +1 > Slogan #3: "kickass database for the future" > > > > On 16. sep. 2015, at 21.06, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > For the CouchApp lovers in this thread: > > > > The code that powers CouchApps in CouchDB hasn=E2=80=99t been touched f= or half a > decade. It has no maintainers, it is buggy, lacks features, and nobody wh= o > is active on the project has any interest in getting involved. > > > > We are here to discuss the future of CouchDB and it is evident that > CouchApp-like / Webserver/Appserver/Database-hybrid features are not it, > regardless of how excited or invested you are. > > > > If you REALLY REALLY care about this particular feature set, you will > have to step and MAKE IT WORK in CouchDB. That means getting into the dir= ty > C, Erlang and JS parts of CouchDB and making this ready for the future. I= f > you say, well, it isn=E2=80=99t so much work as I say, great! Get crackin= g. > > > > If you can=E2=80=99t get together and push this forward, the project wi= ll go > with a direction that its direct contributors are happy to work on, to > maintain, fix and improve. And then any discussion about how to maybe > phrase CouchDB=E2=80=99s marketing message in a way that CouchApps are st= ill hot > are totally NOT where this is going. > > > > You won=E2=80=99t be willing the project into submission for you pet fe= atures by > teaming up on these discussions as a very vocal (dare I say attention > vampire) minority, while the rest of us are quietly trying to ship a kick > as database for the future. > > > > This is open source, we all get a say in where we want to see things > going, but at the end of the day, you will have to put in the elbow greas= e > to make things happen like you want them. We are liberal with giving out > committership, there are literally no barriers to entry, except for a > half-decade old pile of technical debt that nobody else dares to touch. > > > > *drops mic* > > > > *picks up mic again* > > > > PS: before you consider turning this into an ad-hominem attack, or some > insinuation that I am abusing my PMC Chair position to push through my > personal agenda or vendetta against you and your loved ones, or any of th= is > sort of crap (that has come up before), keep it to yourself, thanks. > > > >> On 16 Sep 2015, at 14:42, ermouth wrote: > >> > >>> what went wrong? > >>> how and where do we collect ideas about a slogan? > >> > >> ML is unsuitable =E2=80=93 low engagement, no navigation, zillions of = cluttering > >>>>>> in replies, inability to participate if you subscribed after topic > was > >> issued and so on. Only flaming enthuziasts can use this tool, all othe= rs > >> just pass by. Apache better understand it, enforcing usage of this too= l. > >> > >> And even for enthuziasts it=E2=80=98s hard to track topics, splitted i= nto > several > >> threads. You can only do it only in inbox =E2=80=93 all web UI are eve= n more > ugly. > >> > >>> Imo this should be a form where > >> > >> Form seems too much for slogan. Twitter is enough good, restricts leng= th > >> and provides perfect engagement. If you ask on twi (and do it at least > >> three times taking in account timezones), I think you could receive a > lot > >> of good new slogans. > >> > >> Since slogans all are short, it wouldn=E2=80=98t be hard to create sho= rt list =E2=80=93 > >> about 10-15-20 positions I think. > >> > >> For final poll there exist a lot of online instruments. Also voting > should > >> hide poll results for person until he or she votes =E2=80=93 it titill= ates > person=E2=80=98s > >> curiosity and motivates to make a click. Option =E2=80=98I do not want= to vote, > >> want to see results=E2=80=99 is also good to ensure you=E2=80=98ll hav= e no random clicks > >> just to uncover current results. > >> > >>> what did we discuss if most of the proposals are voted with -1 > >> > >> It only means that both options proposed for voting are weak. > >> > >> BR > >> > >> ermouth > > > > -- > > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > > http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ > > > > --f46d04388e554494e0051fe385da--