Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F62517BE3 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53859 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2015 09:39:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 53817 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2015 09:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 53804 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2015 09:39:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:39:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown ~allinclude:_spf.google.com (nike.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of johs@b2w.com) Received: from [209.85.217.178] (HELO mail-lb0-f178.google.com) (209.85.217.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:38:54 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u14so1580004lbd.9 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=k0dzUAaI9t1s3Daez87fOjCuVzNcIoNrmusDjVb7zyU=; b=eoL+0QezaXns5GI8542zvKtq0jfjJP6xM4D3iJvxodvJzr/A3+oPRZaBfT0GQC2BGC DYKc45OmyLaKJflVJaS/O03HtFcMqr7gBDer7LW2G1kdWgsoHpVkjRsVjwYoj9qeYFmt +F9RguRu4R7ypogZWHKqEHxxg7EjXwc2OOg/HcWWF6hA+u1rj7j3DlXl3PtCLw/Wu4ha tQNAlVsi+gUpJVYkZVEpML+IxR0q/o3FXMFxtjnLQi4fx40YTQ/ZEaKQ0lfxyCORFZml C/27dM1XUK0amHAGyUV6ZKj8deIN1r0PNp1JYrbOEivHz0BeVXQmWUg3mnt2Cn1CjFg9 ZXYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlR7/x91qbnaQhd0txRFhUfwdg27x892sJWVdu6fpkbpVsIeKS8nYw3w4aWWU/vLmUqvjCi X-Received: by 10.112.158.40 with SMTP id wr8mr41284412lbb.51.1421141932579; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.101.147] ([138.62.237.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm711707lal.2.2015.01.13.01.38.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:38:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: HN thread about CouchDB From: Johs Ensby In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:38:50 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <37984D35-1889-4454-ADB0-F46C25907238@b2w.com> References: To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not surprising, looking at google trends ew decline. That is a pure buzz-index, of course, but what we need to do is to = connect it to an up-trend for a broad audience. CouchDB needs to be if not the sister, so the cousin of nodejs and = reactjs or something else that is moving in the right direction. J > On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:00, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >=20 > Heya (excuse the HN link), >=20 > this is not necessarily something for the weekly news, but I think = this is a useful summary of how people think about CouchDB in the wild. = I=E2=80=99m not suggesting this is representative, but it can help guide = us in what we want to do for our marketing activities, if we are not = happy with how people think about CouchDB: >=20 > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D8865079 >=20 > I found the comment about design docs most interesting: = https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D8865687 (although I should send = this to dev@). We should think hard about hiding this detail away from = end-users. >=20 > Best > Jan > -- >=20