Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F31F417E12 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39184 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39147 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39130 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:01 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z12so7590448wgg.9 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:05:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fjobuRdIQyXldw3J7VF8RxZPnKac1FVpHd6FNwdHFLs=; b=XQpQ7XQn7uAkU6EP9ua6VqSbefOlreFzdLXRhSb0W8lRG2JfojCMo74RAyd9n1TeN3 8X0bOqhfC7Kqp8sD2dGNBZKm6KOpOw5bDAQhB58iqASd6PiEYg336HT6Jli/maAtP3cW 4bLG5xkPGMjt1aImwfeWUxzrI3KQ+cQDTl+NAzio+vVKu2kBBa1FKvJI4wdqA8R2ASf8 Ptze4m6iqxg/qBR5XAp0FH+yBka7Uxaz6jNwZ/cri4qjSJPnm3HvF2Ff7VtJlK0MEZeh mqa0qmqURRcRtF8NchKRiM0oxWVientAfPi496wZ7M0sFrS4I3qrVVUBuQZCEigUFfEP /vjw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.212.42 with SMTP id nh10mr2739391wic.52.1414749900575; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.76.200 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:05:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <31769914.374.1414701379970.JavaMail.joant@Joans-MacBook-Pro.local> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:05:00 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New motto? From: Alexander Shorin To: "marketing@couchdb.apache.org" , Andreas Wenk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Andy Wenk wrote: > On 31 October 2014 09:34, Alexander Shorin wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Nick North wrote: >> > Your data - everywhere - all the time >> >> Squatted: https://pragprog.com/news/new-page >> >> P.S. Hi Nick! (: >> > > I am a musician and I write a lot of music these days. What I don't like is > stealing music from others. What I accept in a way is copying music when > the editor is adding his own style (e.g. a cover). What I do like a lot is > be inspired by the work of other musicians. With that I show my respect for > their music. > > There will always be a slogan or sentence already used. I don't think we > will find one, that is not used in a way in the are we are working. So for > me it is totally ok to be inspired by slogans other people already created. > And the case Alex mentioned above is not a problem for me. But that's my > personal opinion .... Collisions with slogans is more sensitive than offending someone by uncanny decisions. While you may ignore someone feelings you couldn't ignore lawyers which would be very happy to punish you for every branding mistake. Music is a little bit different planet and there are different rules for it, but also imho (: -- ,,,^..^,,,