From dev-return-49422-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@couchdb.apache.org Wed Jun 24 13:47:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2847D180633 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 87007 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2020 13:46:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 86994 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2020 13:46:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:46:59 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.6] (business-90-187-221-197.pool2.vodafone-ip.de [90.187.221.197]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id ADC7D40786 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:46:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Lehnardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Subject: Re: Newsfeed IFRAME in Fauxton and IP collection Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:46:57 +0200 References: To: dev@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <66FFD684-DD5D-4C49-B7D3-0E9FB6B91FC0@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) > On 24. Jun 2020, at 14:31, ermouth wrote: >=20 >> My PR was meant to start this discussion >=20 > Unfortunately it was instead merged to master, which is unbearable = imho. > Shouldn=E2=80=99t that PR be rolled back and removed from the master = branch > immediately then? as long as we make sure we don=E2=80=99t cut a release from this, which = is currently not planned, there is no need to rush a revert. > As a proposal it=E2=80=99s ok, but to achieve intended goal I think = it=E2=80=99s enough to > add blogs to Documentation section. Btw making that section look like = a > grid of tiles with appropriate icons might greatly increase both its > attractiveness and UX quality. People don=E2=80=99t usually click through to the blog. There is tons of = good information there that folks in support channels ask questions about time and time = again.=20 I wanted to give all this a more prominent spot, so folks can learn = about all the good stuff on their own. Best Jan =E2=80=94=