couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joan Touzet <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] length restrictions in 4.0
Date Tue, 12 May 2020 20:54:26 GMT
I presume the workaround would be "Replicate back to CouchDB 3.x, but 
truncate to 236 characters in the process?" You'd lose fidelity in the 
db name that way.


On 2020-05-12 4:05 p.m., Robert Newson wrote:
> I still don’t understand how the internal shard database name format has any bearing
on our public interface, present or future.

View raw message