couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] length restrictions in 4.0
Date Tue, 12 May 2020 21:29:08 GMT
You'd have to replicate "back" and adjust the target db name to fit. It doesn't feel like a
terrible hardship.

> On 12 May 2020, at 21:54, Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I presume the workaround would be "Replicate back to CouchDB 3.x, but truncate to 236
characters in the process?" You'd lose fidelity in the db name that way.
> 
> -Joan
> 
> On 2020-05-12 4:05 p.m., Robert Newson wrote:
>> I still don’t understand how the internal shard database name format has any bearing
on our public interface, present or future.


Mime
View raw message