couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Garren Smith <gar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Getting FDB work onto master
Date Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:04:30 GMT
On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org> wrote:

> Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
> then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for
> CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).
>
> PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.
>
> FDB should feel free to merge to master once `make check` is working.
>
> We can hammer out the wide matrix issues on a slower timeframe.
>
> -Joan
>
> On 2020-03-30 19:42, Joan Touzet wrote:
> > OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
> >
> > I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will
> > take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
> >
> > Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
> >
> > -Joan
> >
> > On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
> >> noting that
> >>
> https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/
> >> now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the
> >>> 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
> >>>
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the
> >>>> check passing, I'm trying this now.
> >>>>
> >>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system
> >>>> wide erlang 20 install instead.
> >>>>
> >>>> B.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wohali@apache.org>
wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our
> >>>>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes
> >>>>> the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This
is
> >>>>> a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype
> >>>>> merged to master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build
> >>>>> and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's instructions:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> >>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> >>>>> # then, inside the image:
> >>>>> cd
> >>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
> >>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
> >>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
> >>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
> >>>>> make check-fdb
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge
the
> >>>>> fdb branch to master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers
to
> >>>>> these questions: [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this
> >>>>> point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to
> >>>>> land on master anymore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely
the
> >>>>> next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land
> >>>>> more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
> >>>>> [2]:
> https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message