From dev-return-49107-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@couchdb.apache.org Thu Feb 20 04:10:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C16E180658 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:10:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 37519 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2020 04:10:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 37507 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2020 04:10:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:10:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B3ECB1813E0 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:10:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.984 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.984 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_DMARC_STATUS=0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-GgEffulqfr for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Softfail (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=204.11.51.157; helo=smtp.justsomehost.net; envelope-from=wohali@apache.org; receiver= Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net (smtp.justsomehost.net [204.11.51.157]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E39547DD70 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D84580214 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id cLcpDP3R8m6s for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADFA580228 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.justsomehost.net Received: from smtp.justsomehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.justsomehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2LZkIdO9fxgH for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (toroon0560w-lp130-07-64-229-95-192.dsl.bell.ca [64.229.95.192]) by smtp.justsomehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50820580214 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:57 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: CI for prototype/fdb-layer branch To: dev@couchdb.apache.org References: <7BB9D35A-D68D-44F1-B414-672AB1E09E47@apache.org> <9D35462A-5357-4723-91CA-FDD896991A00@apple.com> From: Joan Touzet Organization: Apache Software Foundation Message-ID: <58dc1378-131a-4ed9-86b9-ee353b36742d@apache.org> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:09:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9D35462A-5357-4723-91CA-FDD896991A00@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey Alex, thanks for this. See below... On 2020-02-19 23:00, Alex Miller wrote: > >> On Feb 19, 2020, at 16:07, Paul Davis wrote: >> >> foundationdb does take a while to build though, so finding binaries >> might short circuit everything to be even a single apt-get line or >> w/e. > > The build is both slow and quite memory hungry. > > In addition to FROM + COPY in docker, foundationdb.org hosts downloads in both a tarball-of-binaries form and a .deb of the server. > >> Though that papers over CentOS support and the like. Dunno what that >> story is like. > > RPMs for RHEL6 and RHEL7 are also published (which I think should correlate to centos6 and centos7). Are there plans for a CentOS 8 RPM? CentOS 8 has been out since September 2019, and is the only CentOS that we support with SpiderMonkey 60 today. > Which I think is to overall say that basically all possible options are open, and updated as part of the FDB release process. -Joan