Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC1210D41 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24145 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 17:19:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 23950 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2013 17:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 23877 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2013 17:18:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:18:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.181] (HELO mail-wi0-f181.google.com) (209.85.212.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:18:52 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ex4so550538wid.8 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tJl0uQRGL/JaSMGs0aFb9YjHgfg7QaKxMeTKQICEeH8=; b=osb776KastYGVnH+p+YAugeAbdoJihQEa1Y9z6RtXmH1c9vLzyEyCOj1Uji2VxBrgG kQ28dXuuzuvqMGJASNCg35gFinZftokSR5zE5OOXVowdqwuC2ASDRLj4H0qxztBaPTV2 ueiOrhmULXOU0Zi6OcU4rzw61BBCHmbA+GQ8ixmvUqi/ydMzbr6gLupu13ZEdgLD4cmu BiQC4dz/1CKy1TEaat8ATyhScTwPKICe8Ci2f8eRDO85pmpsVknmgYoMp5E34uBBnH0x +5IJDmp0cjvPIpn+0yMkP8hIGcGE1vujW5GeLIeuG8aIFik6XEUrD/Hjdgy/tnjwtkE3 PL8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.109 with SMTP id k13mr5755774wiv.35.1382894311128; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.74.208 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:18:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7147589D-AB40-4217-AB3B-EF687879D8E7@apache.org> <1C69142A-D2C8-4AF0-8F98-0143F7C5DB89@apache.org> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:18:31 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] tag our commits From: Alexander Shorin To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Cc: Jan Lehnardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org They are not only greppable, but also have builtin grouping: git log --show-notes=component will show only notes marked as "component" or git log --show-notes=* to show all available notes -- ,,,^..^,,, On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn. >> wrote: >> > How about using git notes? Messing up the commit message is a bad idea. >> >> Looks really good and better than [stuff]! Thanks for *note* (: >> >> Some related links about that I found interesting: >> http://git-scm.com/2010/08/25/notes.html >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-notes.html >> http://alblue.bandlem.com/2011/11/git-tip-of-week-git-notes.html > > > git notes look good if they are greppable (didn't test it yet). I thought > to have this in the commit msg to make it visible but why not. Both methods > are OK for me.