Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D290DC25E for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66453 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 05:05:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 66077 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 05:05:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 66064 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2013 05:05:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kxepal@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:05:34 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so9032881wgh.30 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:05:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2NhFK1fQehRwadjyYbiw5675LPymCZL6fdjLmuuWlbM=; b=Ro4+lIqy/dmvLb3roqNTKwSpU62vIpSZXH9t1OX6KZDHtjdAHA4lO6zRm/49Z1Dbel 6xNrLu/XylaJhLOVxm3dfskK9pPLmcadvvIDWDGO7zLZVkFdNArsJO1kXgyORfaf/I9N n8OvVWoWNLqLxI84RG+64hWNlb5z7HMWIesJj8sbsaqBL5GFbwc+Jfi4CnMjBvUMZW60 IV8fTVuz47RuVktd9ENlhbLa5tIc+CynODKbXdXf6SIgH4YdnomyTPx2UhFehDXjrJyA zIFL+6y+Hko6iunsbEGRXREFNTl3GnEoe4bl+iQw2egvWG87vuCW7NG4DdxIn1tWEsox BmdA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.8 with SMTP id p8mr7922561wiv.32.1372136713155; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.125.137 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:05:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:05:13 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Review Pull Requests in Weekly Meetings From: Alexander Shorin To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for PR review on meetion On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Russell Branca wrote: > Yeah I think tackling JIRAs as a whole would be a bit extreme for the > weekly meeting. Perhaps a JIRA sprint day where everyone hops on for a few > hours and we run down the backlog? > > For a sustainable approach, what about discussing JIRA tickets that have > come up or been modified since the last dev meeting? +1 for JIRA review. I'd collected a lot of issues with patches and/or stalled discussion. Probably, handle them all in one time would be hard, but how about "Issue of the Week" topic? However, I also like JIRA sprint day idea. -- ,,,^..^,,,