Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66C14DA57 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31840 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 31792 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 31778 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 18:03:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:03:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:03:11 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id dn14so2665003obc.11 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:02:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=jwUoUk6014pFn6yXsgmUjVC9D3pKOmFFiFf9nEPA65M=; b=U8xBqknhHRlUdnI8CEz+0UHbBK+mKRpSftqcAsluORX6sSDzxZMhs1i4xdktlj+9DI EfTrWcdk+e0G09w5lVBFk2ZVZ2xZwK6bpDM8yLT+NVcuxnpfgI5/nvjLI5PHet3UIjeg 5PWjIOAWOXf/qM9ceAwrbd13Dw5rdpEn24oqiaLaAC01ZNZYOJ1EpAFc8mbCcGe6f4SW 3kckW1bZwWwC2bAICK/O+9Pk/6QjBU9kLC/AzDPac4/wt/tTwLb7kMys0U5y6Tmkl4Bb jJlhqbcY9xgFjHdml76yyphCPbFd88flJVhmYu7ErIKScqXUlflrQigJUEeQ4a1JwGO5 Bf3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.3.162 with SMTP id d2mr36320698oed.129.1351792970368; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.86.9 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:02:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.61.188.237] In-Reply-To: References: <7060B520E54744EEA3300DD7842C26D8@cloudant.com> <83A56992-9BA7-4FE4-868E-D4FBE5426DF4@redcometlabs.com> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:02:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Futon.Next Proof of Concept From: "matt j. sorenson" To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f850cf076f04cd72d313 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxecH8p6FKvp3h0NagopboMAZMIV6Gnm9mlAdsIthPKFHcpBRJo74XoVpSaCOnc8/M0sQU X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1f850cf076f04cd72d313 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > If the choice is node as a build dependency versus checking in compiled > artifacts, I choose node. > > excellent choice, IMO :D --e89a8fb1f850cf076f04cd72d313--