Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3739DB45 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15464 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 15426 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 15416 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 18:32:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.180] (HELO mail-ia0-f180.google.com) (209.85.210.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:32:21 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f6so2036316iag.11 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=R4C9bhKxDrMIdnrzbxKnOs6JT/rz3jtCrKsm2IdR0Ys=; b=izm325x4K9QTKJpP6VU9SOnNi9+eOhDOJ3h+Pnm1Tc7q5J3qf8s6YwEIuZxbbjfd9/ uu6zN5yyX71/Zb0UeI2yxTe2ebzctJE78WRSw5nSHVdr+18ThGKLenGU9YCJLS0dvDEn GTF7lPexHR78TqeVNkdayd4ry4UsLgrDM66fQZbCHKtfwEaZwZE4YM34uZI3Ox36I0PQ 7ukZHtsQbx20+vc9183VnQ9oam5JfpS9QXvLVY1b2Rx1PXqv1gbs8gJ9UttL+Kamr6jj 0clBVN3wVdOE/ZojDBfD3+bU1GANyHlaoRf05K5qhYZBFsa+MCcmfYx0OjaRuBJTgo3s o4tw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.40.133 with SMTP id x5mr2240148igk.32.1351794720236; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.77.196 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:32:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7060B520E54744EEA3300DD7842C26D8@cloudant.com> <83A56992-9BA7-4FE4-868E-D4FBE5426DF4@redcometlabs.com> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:32:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Futon.Next Proof of Concept From: Benoit Chesneau To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93403d91be38504cd733cd3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae93403d91be38504cd733cd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to clarify. for what does grunt actually it would be pretty easy to handle the same in any language. My main concern today is the status of nodejs in distrributions. For example latest ubuntu has the 0.6.19 where the last versio is 0.8.14. Which can be problematic when we include it in our toolchain. On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > or we can think to an alternative. It starts to really bug me to see so > much user thinking to only use things just because it is trendy and they > are used to. > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:02 PM, matt j. sorenson wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Robert Newson >> wrote: >> >> > If the choice is node as a build dependency versus checking in compiled >> > artifacts, I choose node. >> > >> > >> excellent choice, IMO :D >> > > --14dae93403d91be38504cd733cd3--