Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BEDCDD4B for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91093 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 19:24:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 91028 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 19:24:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 91019 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 19:24:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:24:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mainerror@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.180] (HELO mail-lb0-f180.google.com) (209.85.217.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:23:58 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ge1so1982407lbb.11 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AWgyo9HsCsO/gkWzBALznMBix06Tyw9DfGJ5Zd+Lkr8=; b=kR1JczAG/61PPbxSpDVPpvgdWEzvn6OsrPg7vFsnyKCYK+OBEcwspK8Qld61FqxQLo 53S11+b/yJIL55zgDyEFbfYb/kQ67r01/LKWVT7AYEEU4CwLeDZBcUo7qsv+2BKLsNKP B7OvVez9gm4UVHkQfff/Ufo0Y56fer4RnQHXV9Yjybtzfn7r3y3dI9viZmwrqqINp5th k+wJ8RKRhZGNKg3E4tbxvRzu9fXJHtTD18rU5F4nSbnShPjQI3pDG6FWK3zGFyr9rSk+ hKy/5fXf7JzoRmt2p5MZDqwnjOEtkrY4Af0p3uG+yP35EqfBBJqRzIReMRDRa/429Vm4 Gxjw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.44.65 with SMTP id c1mr15063190lbm.62.1351797817060; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.29.234 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:23:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7060B520E54744EEA3300DD7842C26D8@cloudant.com> <83A56992-9BA7-4FE4-868E-D4FBE5426DF4@redcometlabs.com> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:23:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Futon.Next Proof of Concept From: Octavian Damiean To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040168b5b1ad2d04cd73f479 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d040168b5b1ad2d04cd73f479 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It's starting to bug me enormously to see so much fear and such an amount of aversion against new technologies. In fact it bugs me enough to be driven away from the project. I'll probably start my own version using the tools I prefer. On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > or we can think to an alternative. It starts to really bug me to see so > much user thinking to only use things just because it is trendy and they > are used to. > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:02 PM, matt j. sorenson >wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Robert Newson > wrote: > > > > > If the choice is node as a build dependency versus checking in compiled > > > artifacts, I choose node. > > > > > > > > excellent choice, IMO :D > > > --f46d040168b5b1ad2d04cd73f479--