Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28338 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 20:41:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 20:41:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 96748 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 20:41:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 96688 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 20:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 96680 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 20:41:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:41:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.54] (HELO mail-ww0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:41:29 +0000 Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so459929wwb.23 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.233.163 with SMTP id p35mr3139676weq.98.1280781667262; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.220.143 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:40:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jason Smith Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 03:40:47 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for changes in view server/protocol To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce009f04fe2c5048cdd3865 --000e0ce009f04fe2c5048cdd3865 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 03:34, Paul Davis wrote: > Which is intriguing, because you can suddenly extend features without > touching CouchDB. Imagine arbitrary URL handlers and the such at > various endpoints. You could reimplement things like batch=ok. Or > perhaps, time stamping documents. Or perhaps, last write wins > semantics. Or perhaps, pages that include multiple lists or shows. > This discussion is fascinating and necessary. But I hope we don't lose the thread that 1.0.1 or 1.0.2 should be able to process
input. Chris has a good proposal, easy to implement. I still prefer that my proposal lets the _update see the validation exception but either one would do fine. -- Jason Smith Couchio Hosting --000e0ce009f04fe2c5048cdd3865--