Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39907 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 09:54:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 09:54:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 9389 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 09:54:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 9298 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 09:54:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 9288 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 09:54:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:54:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of b.candler@pobox.com designates 208.72.237.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.72.237.25] (HELO sasl.smtp.pobox.com) (208.72.237.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:53:52 +0000 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C100396955 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 04:53:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=sasl; bh=i3QfjTonUYibzyERovzoM3wJwG0=; b=F7+SJ3H bEfeAUZJXvYATJ9zz4t/yPSs23PO2qnrTK1js/gSei2A8TyRKlaDpfEENqHiLPI7 vXkkShCWx63e2Zye2y+cXZajDhv43T8A5SzY5zyB+qahOW9vcHZg60X4hGSx4VL6 ExEyF3T2K4jCK84koC1h87jx9eOSldoSfTUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ArAlPwO2u+GK7C8oyFOP0gRoZ1TgxOqQa oQe6qOnzrDd11ke/6glkDbZINVIKthXwNeNgPcsVUHJOpjlKogDBv5vglUpJv9nO hDM2cCHqRsT4qjywlZdrBIcTB6TARH38Nmk5QKbRwtWDriYI03AgYaLJuxO7Ucea XzK/9qna2k= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD7896954 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 04:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from zino (unknown [87.194.77.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C27A96953 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 04:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists by zino with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcbvL-00027O-Pn for dev@couchdb.apache.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:53:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:53:27 +0000 From: Brian Candler To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: associating UUIDs to DBs Message-ID: <20100203095327.GA8099@uk.tiscali.com> References: <55047b711002012202j1878120epfb6a34629fcb812b@mail.gmail.com> <46aeb24f1002021341h3a3e6a62l9ab92274646f2c74@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46aeb24f1002021341h3a3e6a62l9ab92274646f2c74@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FB62DCB6-10A9-11DF-8786-6AF7ED7EF46B-28021239!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:41:28PM +0000, Robert Newson wrote: > If couchdb tracked replication by a Merkle tree, it would obsolete the > update_seq mechanism? Only if you weren't doing filtered/selective replication. And probably only if there was nothing else different between the two databases (e.g. _local docs, _design docs, reader acls etc)