Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82630 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 02:19:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 02:19:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 34887 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 02:19:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34811 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 02:19:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 34801 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 02:19:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:19:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:19:11 +0000 Received: by yxe6 with SMTP id 6so8305776yxe.13 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:17:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SODkdG+jfQY+jTxI9xdpnWnmCvu1NYysqVa5Gxqr6eM=; b=eTyVvaPlFDwK2cpIP9Zl6Nrb/al5zq4R0818iBXqlbU2JRHB3TZh1nDoA87oHZtv1f ITkgWWl6Htzue+4OjvMmLvRYAdw/tGIvXReKaeB5CpKZChiDYAw8wZs3RvbFq3uVz0U2 8WPtf650LX3hmd1hAMk942wf/NXzpARq34WEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fpyS+FN6U6fASCDKmR90DrPR4l67U2NE0fKPnXTZnFpahvHFx4IqdT7RTt1Q/w4fPZ if5cHB06lL6X1yxX727hbvHZQQyO7o35k2qtab2+hM+374GlIFI5A9IkYQ3iS8HQe9cD Gij9r32NqHl2N/AStECXISWuBtj5SgqRhk7FI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.57.5 with SMTP id j5mr554667ank.63.1254363470590; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:17:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5F281FD0-3116-47CE-B205-3BF16991AAB7@tumbolia.org> <231DB07F-548C-4C45-BD58-39BB3C861B86@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:17:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent fixes targeted at 0.10.x From: Paul Davis To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Paul Joseph Davis > wrote: >> Chris, >> >> Do you think the uuids fix is worth a new vote? =A0The 040-utility.t pat= ch >> isn't enough by itself IMO. Anyone else able to think of reasons for or >> against? >> > > We have to vote on the release artifact, even if it is a formality. > Right, just wasn't certain if it was worth a revote vs. delaying to 0.10.1. > A cursory glance at the source doesn't reveal any other raw binary > Etags, but if anyone else can look, too, it wouldn't hurt. > > The uuids fix is trivial but the bug is kinda icky... it's > intermittent, so people won't understand why they are getting random > malformed header http errors only sometime. > > I think I'm talking myself into a +1 on the retag. > You convinced me. I'm +1 for a retag. >> Paul >> >> >> >> On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> I noticed some UUID fixes and an etap change targeted at 0.10.x. >>> >>> Should we recall the vote for these? >>> >> > > > > -- > Chris Anderson > http://jchrisa.net > http://couch.io > Paul Davis