Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99088 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 13:18:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 13:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 50139 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 13:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 50073 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 13:18:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 50063 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 13:18:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:18:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.198] (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:18:05 +0000 Received: by vws36 with SMTP id 36so6184976vws.29 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:17:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/ZM6g/DRk6xvyO1GOS501eN0I9cuPxsojXGZGsC9feQ=; b=sbxC9paqjtrHEcomoaomyCPTSUVLinMg/ZV61RpRSdDAtdvmu1NnnDtrCVikDZ+j2l ap4lZS4xPP46e2HtaYFkdnxb5eGiM7B2SugSPqAyXSLdall1X8q9f4qsKfXRZKYmQIUI IR0lXWhv1Bkop6pMe27ByombWwDvWiizR9gYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mHYRob/y+vpZg2TMJrro3HIaoGd/cPHPGvt/vhZ4JSJZLoAM2J78Bne8ug/jPy1dbb nQHzjAn7sD2hGfRM/ovNpQsI1TgwJFudXI/Cb6N70oQj46TI6PmSk08aIy2x2QY007UU 5lMj20+mU8nEpI10rh+4qAQIkBOX9z7YTL8Po= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.111.80 with SMTP id r16mr3919889vcp.76.1255094264582; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:17:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D0EDD3C-3A0E-4153-96DA-07F1BD58BBC6@dionne-associates.com> References: <791835194.1255089331598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <4D0EDD3C-3A0E-4153-96DA-07F1BD58BBC6@dionne-associates.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (COUCHDB-524) make check fail on freebsd 7.2 & osx 10.0 From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Robert Dionne wrote: > fwiw, one thing these failed etaps all have in common is that they start = a > couchdb server > i retried by making sure any other couchdb was sown but still have errors. test/etap/110-replication-httpc...........FAILED before any test output arr= ived test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed....ok 5/13 Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed....dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED tests 7-13 Failed 7/13 tests, 46.15% okay test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs....ok 3/12 Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump init terminating in do_boot () test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs....dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED tests 5-12 Failed 8/12 tests, 33.33% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Fai= led ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t ?? ?? ?? test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t 1 256 13 14 7-13 test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t 1 256 12 16 5-12 Failed 3/25 test scripts. 21/331 subtests failed. Files=3D25, Tests=3D331, 50 wallclock secs (13.54 cusr + 5.52 csys =3D 19.= 06 CPU) Failed 3/25 test programs. 21/331 subtests failed. make: *** [check] Error 1 about server launch wouldn't it be better to launch it on an available port so it cannot conflict with anything? - beno=EEt