Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57153 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2009 15:10:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2009 15:10:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 69689 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2009 15:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 69370 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2009 15:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 69350 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2009 15:10:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:10:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jwall@google.com designates 216.239.45.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.45.13] (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:10:27 +0000 Received: from spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.144]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n19FA5OI022670 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:10:06 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1234192206; bh=BcmLVY7Kf9W+cRA09/6+OARDRO0=; h=DomainKey-Signature:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:X-GMailtapped-By: X-GMailtapped; b=pVcqGteqpLkQr5SKKE7HSw4FGDGWSZtwwCq4MUsInhVgzoTTX /N58rXzE6yXftl0Udmbme+7g/HySuBmEYHYCg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type:x-gmailtapped-by:x-gmailtapped; b=ot77kcTy9OtnPWyTZ32RCAivboJiuA2dsPHtkSSacjuaaEKW0aetqda8GiKke0Jlo hIKqIoPPphJUOFPqZfrQw== Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rndk56.prod.google.com [10.38.137.56]) by spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n19FA21u024891 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:10:02 -0800 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k56so1275477rnd.11 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:10:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.53.5 with SMTP id b5mr1936957aga.74.1234192201886; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:10:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49904612.6060901@gmx.de> References: <49904612.6060901@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:10:01 -0600 Message-ID: <7c40ded80902090710p29127753q8cc376ba439f2052@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.9.0 Delay or Release? From: Jeremy Wall To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636283b0ac72de704627dc35a X-GMailtapped-By: 172.28.16.144 X-GMailtapped: jwall X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636283b0ac72de704627dc35a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 from another "driver developer" Sent from my G1 google phone On Feb 9, 2009 9:05 AM, "Sven Helmberger" wrote: Damien Katz wrote: > > The 0.9.0 release has been dragging on forever as I try to get the replicatio... >From my "driver developer" point of view, the prolonged preparation for 0.9 is a bit of a inconvenience. As it is I stopped doing releases for now to keep the old release 0.8.1 compatible and only commit fixes for 0.9 into trunk for now. I would welcome an early 0.9 release -- and seeing all those issues of people trying to use 0.9 features in 0.8.1 seems to show that I am not the only one. Regards, Sven Helmberger --001636283b0ac72de704627dc35a--