Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46D0810921 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40108 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2014 17:23:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 39891 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2014 17:23:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 39873 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2014 17:23:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.44] (HELO mail-qa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:23:20 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j7so969504qaq.17 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:21:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sUcZrZagIhquDCDa9C74tK8gxenY4UhRx889qcwoKic=; b=cqJ7B/EVyK+jCwxuqIjyl3a5mgBjIjqE8wC9uwkJMTEA1H5gNTmFFKVmLdP5nZ2s7t TZ7ZqelT2kehxHP7bK8DVI2x66xt7cal7/Grae+++43KsYmfKk/Buw6i/0zol1ymwVMi vcQMKIVKCqCScEqLoyYUPAfZlT6vk+94JV2kgPF9DhKJyV0ECs2MO6S/gsTkpRz3p9Nc owKDGm/5DY36ImytM5sptIvspRE6BumL15K2dm6YoLf1/tCsGU8URR5wzJeEyZ3jH4Hf OlcwUfLCmGVDAVNrofPkMjC9xEwys09fPQSYhmwRuq3c2YMInQtmj0BCJtL8wS/n0su9 s2EA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmj6aaaFU/KIaJVuqjLpxNjY7Ia0VzlD8H5RPeAvQJaHWvBU+9cKyaILErh4ZrqkbG5lZu9 X-Received: by 10.224.165.148 with SMTP id i20mr55583851qay.67.1418664114554; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-74-138-17-157.swo.res.rr.com. [74.138.17.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j101sm11058124qge.24.2014.12.15.09.21.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:21:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548F18AE.5080400@rcbowen.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:21:50 -0500 From: Rich Bowen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Austin "content committee" deadlines References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/08/2014 07:59 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:01 PM, > wrote: > >> >> >> The earlier you communicate to this list, or to me, how many day/tracks >> you expect to be able to fill, the better. (One day/track is 6 talks, >> except on closing day, when it's probably 5 due to keynotes and lightning >> talks and whatnot.) >> >> I expect to fill two day/tracks with httpd/web/tomcat/trafficserver stuff. >> >> > Are we gathering this content anywhere right now or is everything on this > list? > It would maybe help to get a document opened which people can use to > propose/organize material? > Thoughts? > Thank you > Lewis > If you would find that helpful, that's fine, but as Jan says, the CFP needs to be the authoritative source of the actual talk proposals, while each "track chair" should be prepared to present me with a list of talks (referencing those talk proposals in the CFP system) that they wish to be their track. For both Budapest and Denver, we created a great deal of headache by having multiple documents that all contradicted one another. As was mentioned elsewhere on this list, we'll also have, I'm sure many 'extra-track' talks that we'll need to fit in elsewhere in order for smaller projects to have representation. Ideally, over the next few events, this will encourage more communities to step up and plan their own tracks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon