Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
To: dev@commons.apache.org
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 00:23:18 +0200
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <nggh4m$ma2$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <57296FF7.10301@apache.org> <ngdtmr$vr5$1@ger.gmane.org> <572ACF8E.3030207@apache.org> <54E91D0D-4D01-4BE0-9E0E-4F37AC762FF0@dslextreme.com> <572B84EE.3000709@apache.org> <ngggii$h44$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
archived-at: Thu, 05 May 2016 22:25:09 -0000

Jörg Schaible wrote:

> Hi Josh,
> 
> Josh Elser wrote:
> 
>> Oh, well then! No pressure :)
>> 
>> I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation between
>> Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you were
>> implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but shouldn't
>> block this 2.1 release.

Just an additional remark: Compatibility across more JVMs *is* an issue, 
since there are platforms where you have no other choice (IBM AIX, Mac, most 
Linux distributions use OpenJDK by default).

> This depends always on the nature of a problem. Therefore I did not make
> any vote for now. Currently it looks like you're right and thanks to Stian
> the problems are covered in trunk on top (sole the problem with the IBM
> JDKs).
> 
>> The other points seem to be "nice to have"'s, but please bring it to my
>> attention is my quick glance missed something that is really bad.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org