Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
To: dev@commons.apache.org
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 00:13:38 +0200
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <ngggii$h44$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <57296FF7.10301@apache.org> <ngdtmr$vr5$1@ger.gmane.org> <572ACF8E.3030207@apache.org> <54E91D0D-4D01-4BE0-9E0E-4F37AC762FF0@dslextreme.com> <572B84EE.3000709@apache.org>
Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
archived-at: Thu, 05 May 2016 22:15:08 -0000

Hi Josh,

Josh Elser wrote:

> Oh, well then! No pressure :)
> 
> I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation between
> Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you were
> implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but shouldn't
> block this 2.1 release.

This depends always on the nature of a problem. Therefore I did not make any 
vote for now. Currently it looks like you're right and thanks to Stian the 
problems are covered in trunk on top (sole the problem with the IBM JDKs).

> The other points seem to be "nice to have"'s, but please bring it to my
> attention is my quick glance missed something that is really bad.

Cheers,
Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org