Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMUw7Y-rWS626rCOX=buVLg_pYbWw7r4Wv_Lp=O+_EdcO_Cggw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMUw7Y-rWS626rCOX=buVLg_pYbWw7r4Wv_Lp=O+_EdcO_Cggw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cloud List <cloud-list@sg.or.id>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:28:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMUw7Y8fPLK3dk9VRf3mmTJrHbO2beuNC531bQFbf5J=tfmGjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Avoid VR downtime when upgrading ACS
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cdbd0e20fbd053f4a38fc
archived-at: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:28:24 -0000

--001a113cdbd0e20fbd053f4a38fc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Sorry to bring up an old question, just want to ask again if anyone knows
if we can upgrade ACS and avoid the downtime caused when the VRs are being
upgraded?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

-ip-


On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Cloud List <cloud-list@sg.or.id> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have done some extensive tests on upgrading ACS from 4.2 to 4.8, and one
> of the steps involves upgrading the virtual routers (VRs) which will cause
> downtime to network served by the VRs. Is there a way I can avoid such
> downtime?
>
> Will having redundant VRs for every network help to avoid the downtime?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank youi.
>
> Cheers.
>
> -ip-
>

--001a113cdbd0e20fbd053f4a38fc--