Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADfcUwH5JnyxZVirY6iVqK6WAgGSN9P3CNQg-uwbuwq1fp8D-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADfcUwExS-JJH01AygU==5KADCLEBeNHteLBQeywQXKtJWVRCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADfcUwF7RbVxNC=8Q3_C2Ncte+e60U8B5x5uZkiPitL4p7dang@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG97rac-Vy1adRAtPoUQqcp2mtPUn6TNom4gcWD32_Otbf9xXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADfcUwH5JnyxZVirY6iVqK6WAgGSN9P3CNQg-uwbuwq1fp8D-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafael_Weing=C3=A4rtner?= <rafaelweingartner@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:17:25 -0300
Message-ID: <CAG97raeaqDkryfKStV7SLwMQP5FTR7oSYhnGpztZTzf-BKks6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed2282479e3053e1ed645
archived-at: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:17:32 -0000

--001a113ed2282479e3053e1ed645
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That is a good question.
Sorry I have not seen your first email. I have just read it now. I noticed
you already tried dedicating a POD to an account.

I am curious by what you meant with:
"When the account selects this service offering, the instance is created on
an empty host. Addition instances created with this service offering then
get put onto the same host, rather than looking for other free hosts within
the same pod."

Have you tried allocating VMs until the host gets full?

What do you want to happen when this dedicated POD gets full?

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:14 AM, cs user <acldstkusr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thanks for responding. It is possible to force them to only be able to us=
e
> that pod however?
>
> So that when the create a machine, these machines are forced to launch in
> that pod.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Rafael Weing=C3=A4rtner <
> rafaelweingartner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain.
> > Have you tried that?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, cs user <acldstkusr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest
> > version
> > > of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a
> > particular
> > > pod?
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, cs user <acldstkusr@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Question regarding dedicating a Pod to an account......
> > > >
> > > > If I dedicate a Pod to an account, login as that account and then
> > create
> > > > an instance, when it comes to the affinity screen, I get the
> following:
> > > >
> > > > "Please select any affinity groups you want this VM to belong to"
> > > >
> > > > However, what I really want to do is force this account to only be
> able
> > > to
> > > > create hosts in this pod. If this is not possible then it should
> > default
> > > to
> > > > this being ticked. Is there a way to accomplish this?
> > > >
> > > > I've also tried creating a new service offering and creating it wit=
h
> > > ImplicitDedicationPlanner,
> > > > with planner mode strict. However, all this appears to do is the
> > > > following......
> > > >
> > > > When the account selects this service offering, the instance is
> created
> > > on
> > > > an empty host. Addition instances created with this service offerin=
g
> > then
> > > > get put onto the same host, rather than looking for other free host=
s
> > > within
> > > > the same pod.
> > > >
> > > > So to summarize.... I want to either force an account to only launc=
h
> > > > instances in one Pod, or for this option to be the default. Is ther=
e
> a
> > > way ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weing=C3=A4rtner
> >
>


--=20
Rafael Weing=C3=A4rtner

--001a113ed2282479e3053e1ed645--