Mailing-List: contact dev-help@clerezza.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <etPan.524c4a50.7c3dbd3d.1c43@dhcp-10-0-1-108.searchbox.lan>
References: <etPan.524c4a50.7c3dbd3d.1c43@dhcp-10-0-1-108.searchbox.lan>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:40:10 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CALvhUEVqgqeDeM4U0xYc=N05QKTn_j0+MFWOCeW26L98Kk4bWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Faceting with Lucene in CRIS
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reto_Bachmann=2DGm=FCr?= <reto@wymiwyg.com>
To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011770db00e90204e7c4b963

--089e011770db00e90204e7c4b963
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Stephane

Really cool that the faceted search is going to be scalable!

I created an issue for the marking of the respective properties and will
look into it asap: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-828.

Cheers,
Reto


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Stephane Gamard <stephane@gamard.net> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> As I dive deeper and deeper into my learning and updates on the rdf.cris
> I've come to realise that the Faceting implementation is not optimal for
> Lucene. We're experiencing extremely slow faceting do to the post-search
> facet collector that iterates thru the document list untill hits.length.
>
> It would be fairly trivial now to implement facets as per Lucene
> specifications. The most "drastic" change that I am yet too ignorant to try
> for myself is to have the ability to know when a VirtualProperty should be
> considered for faceting at indexing time.
>
> This would require a small update of the DefinitionGraph by maybe adding a
> property "facetable" for VirtualProperties?
>
> _Stephane
>
>
>

--089e011770db00e90204e7c4b963--